An ATS checker tool does in seconds what would take a human 20 minutes: it compares your resume against a job description and shows you exactly where the gaps are. But the tool is only as useful as your ability to interpret its output and act on the findings. Many job seekers run the check, see a score, and do not know what to do next. This guide walks you through the full workflow - from uploading your resume to submitting an improved version - so you can use the tool strategically rather than just informatively.
Try It FreeFor your resume, use the version you plan to submit - the same file format, the same content, the same structure. If your resume is a PDF, make sure it is a text-based PDF, not a scanned image, because the tool needs to read the actual text. For the job description, copy the complete text from the job posting: title, summary, responsibilities section, and requirements section. The more complete the job description input, the more accurate the keyword analysis. If the posting is short, look for additional details on the company careers page or LinkedIn listing, which sometimes include expanded descriptions.
Run the initial check. Candidates with strong experience sometimes score surprisingly low because of formatting or language choices - the tool's job is to surface exactly that kind of gap. Candidates who have carefully tailored their resume may score above 80% immediately. Either way, the number you see is your starting point, not your final score.
Required skills count more than preferred ones. Keywords that appear in the job title and multiple sections of the job description carry more weight than terms mentioned once in passing. A score below 60% typically means there are significant keyword gaps - multiple required skills, tools, or qualifications that your resume does not reflect. A score of 60-75% means partial alignment with some important gaps remaining. A score above 75% means strong keyword coverage and you are a competitive candidate from an ATS perspective. Aim for 75-85% before submitting. Above 90% is diminishing returns and can indicate over-optimization.
This list tells you what the ATS is seeing and crediting. Confirm that the matched keywords are genuinely in your resume in meaningful context - not just mentioned once in passing. Keywords that appear in your skills section, your summary, and your experience bullets are weighted more heavily than keywords that appear only once in an obscure bullet. If you see a keyword listed as matched but you know it only appears in a minor context, consider reinforcing it. For example, if 'project management' is shown as matched because it appears in one bullet, and the job description uses it six times, you might add it to your skills section and your summary as well. More substantive presence equals higher confidence in the match.
Go through each missing term and decide whether you can legitimately add it to your resume. Ask yourself: do I have genuine experience with this skill or tool? If yes, find the section of your resume where the related experience lives and revise a bullet or add the term to your skills section. Be specific about where you add keywords. A keyword that appears in both the skills section and a specific work achievement is recognized as more substantive by both the ATS and the human reviewer. Work through the missing list methodically: required skills first, then preferred skills, then nice-to-have terms.
Compare the new score to your starting score. A focused revision session typically moves the score by 10-20 percentage points. If your score improved significantly, verify that the changes you made sound natural in the context of the full resume - not just inserted keywords. If your score improved but is still below 75%, run another iteration. Identify the remaining missing required keywords and find additional opportunities to add them. If you have genuinely added all the keywords you can honestly include and your score is still below 70%, that may be a signal that this role is not well matched to your current background - the tool is giving you honest feedback that the gap is a skills gap, not just a language gap.
Before you submit, do a human-facing quality review. Read the resume aloud from top to bottom. Every sentence should flow naturally. Every claim should be something you can discuss confidently in an interview. Your most important achievements should be visible in the first third of the page. Check practical details: your email address is current, your LinkedIn URL works, your phone number is correct. Check formatting: consistent date format, consistent capitalization, no orphaned single words at the end of lines that waste space. Save as a text-based PDF with a professional file name. Now you have a resume that is optimized for the ATS, readable by a human, and accurately represents your experience - submit with confidence.
Check your resume against any job description in under 60 seconds.
Add to Chrome for FreeRun a check for every application where the job description is meaningfully different from the last role you applied to. If you are applying to five similar roles in the same field, you might check once against a representative job description and use that tailored version for all five. But when the role type, required skills, or industry changes, run a fresh check with the new job description. Think of the ATS check as part of your application preparation, not a one-time setup task.
Not exactly. ATS checker tools simulate the keyword matching process that most ATS systems perform, but they cannot replicate the exact algorithm, weighting, or cutoff score of a specific company's ATS configuration. What they can do is reliably identify keyword gaps and give you directional guidance on your alignment with a specific job description. A high score on the tool strongly correlates with better performance in real ATS screening, even though it is not a guaranteed prediction.
It is worth using for any role you genuinely want. Even for less competitive applications, an ATS check takes five minutes and ensures you have not missed obvious keyword opportunities. The real value is not just passing the ATS filter - the process of reviewing missing keywords often surfaces ways to strengthen your resume that you would not have noticed otherwise. Candidates who do this consistently across applications develop better intuition for tailoring over time.
Free Chrome extension. Works on LinkedIn, Indeed, and any job board. No account needed.
Add to Chrome for FreeFree to use. No signup required.